Healthcare AI & Compliance

Clinical Evidence Agent

This agent reviews and grades every clinical claim your product, content, or investor materials make against the actual evidence base (peer-reviewed studies, FDA guidance, clinical practice guidelines) before it goes out the door. Health tech companies live or die by credibility: one overstated claim in a landing page, a pitch deck, or an AI chatbot's response can trigger regulatory scrutiny or destroy clinician trust. We build the guardrails and reference library that let your team, and any AI systems you're already running, speak confidently about what the evidence supports, flag what's still unproven, and never drift into language that reads as unlicensed diagnostic or treatment advice. It's the difference between a claim you can defend with a citation and one that sounds good but can't survive a regulator's or journalist's second look.

This is a capability we deliver for you as a service, not a role we’re hiring for.

How We’d Approach This

A clear, staged plan, not a black box

These are the service-specific steps inside our six-step process.

1
Audit your existing claims (website, product copy, chatbot responses, investor deck) against the underlying studies and grade each one for evidence strength.
2
Build a small pilot: one content surface, such as your product's AI assistant or marketing site, run through the evidence-grading workflow against a fixed set of claims.
3
Walk through the graded results together (which claims hold, which need softening or a citation, which cross into diagnostic territory) and agree on the fix list.
4
Ship a living evidence library and review workflow your team owns, with clear escalation rules for anything a human medical reviewer should sign off on before it's public.

What You Get

Deliverables from this engagement

A graded evidence log mapping every current clinical claim to its source and confidence level
A reusable claim-review workflow, with an AI-assisted first pass, your marketing, product, and support teams can run before anything ships
House style rules for what language is evidence-backed versus what needs a hedge or a citation
A short training session for your team on where the diagnostic-authority line sits and why

Six Ways We Could Architect This

Different engagement, different build, pick the shape that fits

There’s more than one way to deliver on this service. Browse a few of the ways we’d structure the work, depending on your speed, budget, and integration needs.

Read all 6 architectures as text

Lean Fast-Start Architecture

Claim Input

Draft Marketing or Product Claim
Claim Text Extraction
FDA Guidance Snapshot

Local Evidence Lookup

PubMed API Query Script
Local Reference Document Set
Simple Grading Rubric
Citation Attachment Step

Manual Review Gate

Pass Fail Grade Output
Manual Review Before Publish
Approved Claim Published
Rejected Claim Returned

Cloud-Native / Managed Services Architecture

Claim Ingestion API

Content and Chatbot Claim Feed
Ingestion API Endpoint

Managed Evidence Layer

Evidence Vector Database
Peer Reviewed Study Corpus
FDA and Guideline Corpus

Managed Grading Service

LLM Grading Inference Service
Grading Results Database

Compliance Dashboard

Compliance Review Dashboard
Marketing Team Consumer
Legal Team Consumer

Event-Driven & Automation-First Architecture

Claim Submission Trigger

Webhook from CMS or Chatbot
Claim Grading Queue
Source System Identifier

Automated Grading Workers

Evidence Grading Worker
Confidence and Risk Scoring

Automated Routing

Risk Level Assessment
Auto Approve Low Risk Claim
Flag High Risk to Compliance Team
Compliance Team Notification
Publish Confirmation Log

Enterprise-Grade & Compliance-Ready Architecture

Evidence Governance

Versioned Evidence Library
FDA Guidance Update Feed
Clinical Guideline Registry

Redundant Grading Pipeline

Primary Grading Service
Secondary Grading Service
Role Based Access Control

Audit and Signoff

Full Audit Trail Store
Regulatory Affairs Signoff
Immutable Compliance Archive

Governed Publication

Approved Content Release
Regulatory Affairs System

AI-Augmented, Human-in-the-Loop Architecture

Incoming Claims

Product Copy Claim
Chatbot Response Draft
Investor Deck Claim

AI Evidence Grading

LLM Claim Extraction
Evidence Corpus Matching
Citation and Confidence Score

Human Approval Checkpoint

Confidence and Regulatory Risk
Auto Approved Low Risk Claim
Medical and Legal Reviewer Approval
Rejected Claim Sent Back

Customer Facing Systems

Live Chatbot Response Set
Published Marketing Content

Integration-Heavy / Ecosystem-Connected Architecture

Clinical Evidence Gate

Evidence Grading Engine
Guardrail Rule Set

Client AI Systems

Existing AI Chatbot
Support Automation System

Content and Marketing Systems

CMS Content Pipeline
Investor Relations Content
Marketing Automation Tool

Records and CRM

Regulatory Affairs Database
CRM System
Compliance Reporting Export

Ready to get started?

Tell us what you’re trying to get done and we’ll help you find the highest-leverage place to start, scoped small enough to prove itself before you commit to anything bigger.

Talk to us about Clinical Evidence Agent

Most engagements like this start as a $500–$2,500 pilot, see full pricing.